The Cases For and Against Stem Cell Research

People who argue against embryonic stem cell research do not see the brightness of the results. They argue about natural selection, and how we are testing God because we are pushing away “the time” when humans go. My question to them is the following: Who are you to judge whether or not we are testing God? What I mean is, you do not know what God is doing of this situation. Maybe He wants us to find the cure to make the sick happier and live longer. He teaches us to take care of the poor, the sick and the needy. As a Catholic, I believe that God is testing us about how we care about the positive that will be the future, caring for the sick and to help them live their life better.

Article 2 - The Cases For and Against Stem Cell Research

And confusing because while he speaks out against stem cell research in moral terms, his re-election campaign committee has accepted well over $50,000 in contributions from companies that conduct this very kind of research, according to FEC filings compiled by PoliticalMoneyLine.

Mindmap of Article 2: The Cases For and Against Stem Cell Research

Mindmap on "The Cases For and Against Stem Cell Research Based upon this reasoning, the subsequent argument against embryonic stem cell research is that human life is inherently valuable and should not be voluntarily destroyed. It has been argued that "the line at which an embryo becomes a human life remains as arbitrary as ever".

The Cases For and Against Stem Cell Research

The final argument for the people against embryonic stem cells research is the scientific flaws that could be involved with the use of embryonic stem cells in therapies. According to Wikipedia (2008), one concern with embryonic stem cell treatments is that sometimes stem cells from embryos can create tumors. The bottom line of this argument is that stem cells may not be as good as some scientists say they are. The main issue of this raging debate is whether potential embryonic life should be treated the same way as you or me.

Article 2 - The Cases For and Against Stem Cell Research


2. One of the other important arguments against stem cells research is that there has been virtually no real successful cure or even a potential for cure found to support destroying the beginning of life, there’s no evidence that a destroyed human embryo will help someone.10. The final arguments against stem cell research deal with the actual cost of such treatments is simply too high to be implemented on a large scale.7. Another strong set of arguments against stem cell research is that some believe that embryonic stem cell is not stable and might on a DNA level carry a possibility of genetic disorders in itself.While the source of the stem cells is the major focus of ethical debate, issues such as the application of any potential technology derived from stem cell research are widely discussed. Consideration of these issues is ongoing, but scientists, theologians, governments, and private corporations have all reached some conclusions about what should and should not be done with stem cells. There is no distinct dichotomy in this discourse—opinions cannot be described as solely in favor of or against stem cell research.