John Locke and Thomas Hobbes’ accounts of the state of nature differ greatly with regards to individual security. Both present a stateless scenario but draw completely different conclusions, with inhabitants of Locke’s state of nature having greater security than those in Hobbes’. One reason for these different conclusions lies in their opposing understanding of human nature, with, in the most crude sense Hobbes seeing man as a creature of desire and Locke as one of reason. A second explanation for their conclusions is their understanding of the nature of rights. Locke saw certain rights as independent of government or the state, were as Hobbes in a sense saw them as coming from the state. Finally, both give what they call laws of nature which ought to guide behaviour in the state of nature, but Hobbes laws are far less secure than Locke’s, thus being another reason why inhabitants of Locke’s scenario would enjoy greater security.
John Locke and Thomas Hobbes Enlightenment Ph
John Locke and Thomas Hobbes were known as social contract theorists and natural law theorists, too. However, they are both completely different in terms of their stand and conclusions in several laws of nature. Thomas Hobbes was an English philosopher from Malmesbury. He became famous when his book, “Leviathan,” created the foundation of the political philosophy from the West. Hobbes was able to garner several recognitions. He was the champion of absolutism for the sovereign. Not only that, he greatly contributed in different subjects. These include ethics, geometry, and physics of gases, theology, and even political science.
john locke vs thomas hobbes econ project
A humanidade pode viver em harmonia em uma sociedade livre? Ambos os filósofos John Locke e Thomas Hobbes tratam disso de maneira a iluminar a busca do estabelecimento de uma nação livre.
John Locke and Thomas Hobbes Debate Project